Skip to main content

Some Implications of Polygamy

Taking quotes out of context and comments made a century or more apart under different circumstances by church leaders is one strategy of church critics to try and fabricate contradictions in church teachings to confuse uniformed people. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints practiced polygamy in the early days of the church and changed that policy after some 70 years.  It has not been practiced in since about 1905. Brigham Young and Gordon B Hinckley made statements that critics of the church like to use to sow seeds of misunderstanding regarding the subject.  Brigham Young taught it as a doctrine and Gordon B. Hinckley said it was not taught as a doctrine.

People that view marriage and fidelity as an important part of a good life and living in a culture of monogamy will usually have a natural bias against the practice of polygamy under any circumstance.  The idea of a man having more than one wife has been viewed in polite society for centuries as an immoral practice.  This has occurred even while the sins of adultery and fornication have been prevalent in societies around the world.

When truth seekers hear about the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the fact that at one time some men in the church had multiple wives, they may have some contempt toward the idea and therefore have a negative view of the church. Depending on where they get their information they may never learn the fact that Joseph Smith also had an aversion to it. When God revealed the doctrine to him he resisted the idea for some time. When he as the leader of the church began implementing the practice himself he proceeded with as little announcement as much as possible.  Some critics use conjecture to allude that this was due to him being a promiscuous person and keeping any relationships secret from his wife. 

He never wrote his personal feelings about it, but people around him wrote how he reacted when instructed by revelation to implement the principle. Many leaders of religious groups in his day and the modern-day have used their influence to encourage perversion of sexual devotion to a corrupt leader. From his own moral standpoint, Joseph Smith knew this. He had expressed in his personal history the first vision experience he received.  He knew when God was instructing him, even commanding him to do something and he could not deny it. His claim to being a prophet was not a convenient one.

Because he proceeded to implement polygamy without public announcement, his critics took advantage of this fact and created their own false narratives to suit their purpose of labeling him a sex addict and a false prophet.  He did love his wife and was committed to her. All of his writings and witnesses around him reflect this. He did not receive the practice of plural marriage with a willing heart. He never gathered his wives into a household as his Utah successors did, nor did he spend much time with them.

History shows that Joseph spent little time with his plural wives as he was busy with his own household and the business of the church. He clearly did not spend his time as a sex obsessed king with his harem as his critics would have their audiences believe. It is the versions of polygamy filled with conjecture demonizing the prophet, that have little truth to them that have been spread about in Christian communities around the world as the church has grown.

During Brigham Young's presidency as the church moved to an isolated place in the west,  polygamy had been implemented and practiced publicly. It was considered a commandment to those to whom it was given by the Lord. At the time of President Hinckley some 160 years later, it was not allowed and had long since been commanded to stop the practice. The Book of Mormon and Bible do show that polygamy is the exception and monogamy is the rule. 

Polygamy is something that God has commanded from time to time, but it always remains the exception. If someone disavows prophetic leadership, then accepting polygamy as a reasonable practice under certain circumstances is easy to condemn.  When Brigham Young gave a talk calling it a requirement in his day, only a small percentage of the Church was practicing polygamy. He had said that failing to accept the commandment to those to whom it was given was to reject the will of the Lord at that time. He was not saying that 95% were going to hell if they didn't practice it. Context is crucial when examining statements by church leaders regarding sensitive subjects.

Brigham Young was not stating that polygamy is a requirement to enter into Heaven. Biased views against him and the Church twist his statement in order to reflect such. He is stating that the doctrine of polygamy was a commandment from the Lord, and if not practiced, it must at least be accepted as a commandment given to God's prophet on the Earth. Not accepting such would be denying the prophet and denying God's commandments. Denying prophetic leadership could be the cause of a problem when picking and choosing what to accept. While the acceptance of polygamy was not an easy thing for all members, at this time in the church's history the commandment of polygamy was very much in effect for the church.

Gordon B. Hinckley in his interview with Larry King in 1998 is stating that practicing polygamy in the modern-day and at the present would be a fast route to ex-communication. And he would be right. Polygamy was no longer the commandment. It was no longer in practice. The exception to the rule was removed and monogamy once again has become the rule of marriage. This is a biblical precedent. Neither contradicts the other. They were both following the commandments of God in the completely different eras that they lived in. This is how prophetic leadership guides the church.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Discussion With Grok AI; The Problem With the Concept of Creation out of Nothing or "Ex Nihilo", and Free Will Doctrines,

Discussion with AI:   The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Traditional Theological Teachings Charlie Catholics and Protestants claim that God, i.e. the Trinity   created matter out of nothing and then created the Earth and everything else. This is known as creation ex nihilo. If God is truly all knowing and all powerful and created in this manner, there is nothing it can create that it would not already know the beginning from the end.   Such power would indicate that any creation would be whimsical because it would be unnecessary. There’s nothing God could create if it was truly omniscient as thought in traditional theology that would be meaningful.  Any act of creation would be unnecessary. Such acts therefore would be whimsical in nature by such a being since they are being done one time only according to biblical scholars and theologians. Grok AI These are deep theological and philosophical questions about the nature of God, creation, and purp...

The Principle of Grace-Latter-day Saints compared to Orthodox Biblical Teachings

Many modern Christian teachers and theologians claim a doctrine of salvation by grace that disregards any effort on the part of the person to be saved.  The discussion often involves the concept of faith without works being dead and yet any works that do happen to come about as a result of our faith have no bearing on our salvation.   Latter-day Saints do hold to doctrines of grace.  There is no action or series of actions we can perform on our own that will save us from our sins without the atonement of Jesus Christ. Salvation is therefore only by his grace and its accompanying virtue of mercy. The acts of making and keeping covenants with ordinances to confirm them are gifts of God's love. Faith in Jesus Christ saves us. Our willingness to enter into a covenant relationship with the Father and the Son is the evidence of our faith. If God tells us, or even commands us to do something, what is the effect? Consider the following example. We have been given an abundanc...

Evangelical Biblical Apologetics Against The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Modern Evangelicals and other "Mainstream Christians" have many apologists among their ranks. For millennia they have defended the church against heretics, agnostics, and atheists. Biblical apologists, however, devised new tactics when the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Joseph Smith came on the scene in the 1820s.  The main goal of these “mainstream Christian”apologists is to discredit Joseph Smith in any way they can. The earliest apologists defended basic belief in God and Christianity against agnostics and atheists to divert their attacks in order to protect the church against claims and allegations that might destroy the faith of the weaker believers.  As the Christian faith aged along, heresies also developed within the ranks of those claiming authority or scholarship, and likewise had to be rooted out.  It has been some 200 years now since Joseph Smith made his first claims as a young man proclaimed to have seen the Father and the Son in a vision. ...